Showing posts with label Narrative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Narrative. Show all posts

Wednesday, 11 June 2014

What is 'narrative structure'?

What is Narrative Structure? 

Narrative structure is really about two things: the content of a story (i.e. what a story is about) and the form used to tell a story (i.e. how a story is told). 

Two common ways to describe these two parts of narrative structure are: story and plot.

Story refers to the raw materials of dramatic action as they might be described in chronological order in a film. 

Plot refers to the form of storytelling, or the structure the story follows. 

An example may be helpful.

If we want to analyze narrative structure, we can use Who? What? and Where? questions to look at the story or content of a movie.  ‘How?’  questions are used to examine plot structure. So, to describe the story in Star Wars, for example, we would need to answer the following questions:

·         Where is the story set?
·         What event begins the story?
·         Who are the main characters?
·         What conflict(s) do they face?
·         What happens to the characters as they face this conflict?
·         Who wins the conflict?
·         What rewards do they receive?

To describe the plot structure of the movie, we would need to answer these questions:

·         How is the major conflict in the story set up?
·         How are the main characters introduced?
·         How is the story moved along so that the characters must inevitably face the film’s central conflict?
·         How is the dramatic confrontation set up as the film draws to its close?
·         How does the film resolve most of the major conflicts set up at the outset?

From the audiences’ perspective, story and plot refer to the different ways movies construct meaning for spectators. Story is about trying to determine the key conflicts, main characters, setting, and events in a movie. Plot is about determining the stages at which key conflicts are set up and resolved. What’s interesting about most of the movies made in Hollywood is that, while the stories may change, the plot structure is virtually identical in most of the movies made by Hollywood.  

According to Bordwell and Thompson, the plot is what we explicitly see and hear while the story includes information that is inferred (suggested) to the viewer.

H O L LYWOOD AND THE CLASSICAL NARRATIVE STRUCTURE
The most common narrative structure in mainstream films is called the Classical Narrative Structure.

The Classical Narrative Structure
The Classical Narrative Structure is called this because it is the way most movies are made in Hollywood. It’s not classic because it is the oldest structure of storytelling or the best, but the most common. It is the storytelling structure in Star Wars, Buster KeatonÕs The General (1926), The Matrix (Andy and Larry Wachowski, 1999), and any number of other films we might think of.  It’s based on a three-act format that organizes the story in the following way.

Act I  The Setup
Here, we are introduced to the main characters in the story, their goals, and the obstacles they are likely to face to achieve their objectives. The main conflict in the story is introduced, as well as the major antagonist (the villain) who will stand in the way of the protagonist’s (the hero’s) objectives.

We can call Act I in a movie the Hook. It sets up the story so that the film engages the attention of the audience and suggests the story’s likely development. Act I generally takes up about one quarter of a film’s total length.

Act II  The Development
Here plot complications are added to the story. An increasing sense of urgency is created when the main characters encounter obstacles that stand in the way of their journey. The second act generally occupies the middle two-quarters of the film and it often includes a false resolution to the main conflict set up in Act I. Once the false resolution has been encountered, the action in the movie generally points inevitably toward a necessary climax.

Throughout Act II, Cause-Effect Relationships propel the main characters along. Cause-effect rela- tionships involve actions that force a reaction on the part of some character, leading to a new action and reaction, and so on.

Act III  The Resolution
In the final segment of the film, the results of the story’s main conflict come to dramatic con- frontation. This is called the Climax. It is the point where key struggles are waged and an eventual victor is determined. In Hollywood films, needless to say, the eventual victor is usually our hero.

Following the climax, Closure is introduced into the story, which simply means that all the major conflicts, issues, or ideas in the story are resolved. The so-called Hollywood ending is the most popular kind of closure in the classical narrative structure. Films with this kind of conclusion usually close with a sense that the protagonists in the film live happily ever after.

Sunday, 2 June 2013

Critical Perspectives in Media Q1(b) - Concepts and Theorists

 Representation - Richard Dyer

Dyer says that when considering the representation of a media product (i.e. your media production), we should ask the following questions:

1. What sense of the world is it making?  (In other words, what representation of the world is the product making?)
2. What does it imply?  Is it typical of the world or deviant?  (In other words, what messages are the representations creating?  Are these representations and messages familiar or unusual?)
3. Who is it speaking to?  For whom?  To whom?  (In other words, who is the intended audience for this product and how do the representations attract and address them?)
4. What does it represent to us and why?  How do we respond to the representation?  (In other words, what meanings and interpretations are created by the product?  How do you and other people interpret the product?).

Remember that representation is very complex.  For people it can involve gender, ethnicity, sexuality, ethnicity, regional identity, age, age and social class and status.  These can be constructed through characteristics like appearance (e.g. hair, clothing, make-up, jewellery) , relationships, possessions, behaviour and actions, voice (e.g. tone, accent, dialect, sociolect), job, hobbies, values etc.

Representation is not just about people.  For example, you may be able to analyse the representation of places, time periods and themes (such as betrayal or love).

Also see Stuart Hall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTzMsPqssOY

See here for exemplars for representation: http://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/179236-example-candidate-answers-from-june-2013.pdf

Genre - Daniel Chandler, Steve Neale, John Hartley, David Buckingham, Deborah Knight, Gunther Kress, Nicholas Abercrombie, Tom Ryall, John Fiske, Rick Altman, Jonathan Culler, David Bordwell

Watch the following slideshow http://www.slideshare.net/HeworthMedia/genre-theory-6920670
Which of the theorists says something about genre that connects with your own product and the points you want to make about it?

Here are some of the key points:

Chandler 

  • Conventions of content and/or form
  • Assumption of the 'ideal reader'
  • 'Interpretive community' can share a genre
Neale
  • Repetition and difference
  • Guarantee of meanings and pleasure (for audience)
  • Audience expectations of what a genre will provide
Hartley
  • Films often have the conventions of more than one genre
Knight
  • We enjoy genres because we anticipate what is going to happen
Ryall
  • Genre is a structural framework for producer and viewer
Altman
  • Media language (meaning) and iconography defines genres
Culler
  • Genre conventions establish a 'contract' of shared understanding between creator and reader
Use these framework for analysing your own product in terms of genre: http://social.ocr.org.uk/files/ocr/Generic%20Markers.pdf


Media Language - Michael Wohl

Michael Wohl is a film maker, author and software designer.  Read his explanation of the 'language of film' and see if his examples relate to your production.
http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/language_of_film.html

His explanation of how camerawork creates meaning is very useful.  He breaks it down as follows:

  • Who - the CU of a character
  • What (is going on) - the MS showing a character performing actions
  • Where - the LS showing the location
  • When - shots that tell the viewer the overall point in the story that has been reached or the time of day or the time period
  • Why - the ECU or BCU that suggests what a character is thinking
  • How - MCUs of a character perorming an action or a series of CUs or ECUs of actions
  • With whom - relationships and interaction (two shot, OTS shot, wide shot etc.)
He also makes some very good points about editing but he does not write so much about sound or mise-en-scene.  


Audience - Stuart Hall

Read about Hall's three interpretative codes here: http://www.slideshare.net/dphillips4363/reception-theory-presentation-833299  How did you intend audiences to interpret your product?  How did they interpret it?

Narrative - Todorov and Levi-Strauss

See here http://howardschoolmedia.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Narrative




Friday, 9 March 2012

A2 Examination Q1(b) - Narrative theory (formalism and structualism)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080730010526AAeiCxA
http://www.iep.utm.edu/literary/

In literary theory, formalism refers to critical approaches that analyze, interpret, or evaluate the inherent features of a text. These features include not only grammar and syntax but also literary devices such as meter and tropes. The formalist approach reduces the importance of a text’s historical, biographical, and cultural context. (e.g. Propp, Todorov)
In literary theory, structuralist criticism relates literary texts to a larger structure, which may be a particular genre, a range of intertextual connections, a model of a universal narrative structure, or a system of recurrent patterns or motifs. Structuralism argues that there must be a structure in every text, which explains why it is easier for experienced readers than for non-experienced readers to interpret a text. (e.g. Levi-Strauss, Barthes)
Source: Wikipedia

A2 Examination Q1(b) - Narrative devices and theories: further reading

Devices:
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Students/ota9901.html
http://www.filmreference.com/encyclopedia/Independent-Film-Road-Movies/Narrative-DEFINING-FILM-NARRATIVE.html
http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.php/Narration_in_Film
http://www.sandhills.edu/academic-departments/english/film/narrativearc.html
http://www.narrati.com/Narratology/Literary_Devices-Plot.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_technique
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_device

Theory:
http://www.slideshare.net/longroadmedia/narrative-theory-hand-out-12717640
http://www.mediaknowall.com/as_alevel/alevkeyconcepts/alevelkeycon.php?pageID=narrative
http://www.slideshare.net/aelialicinia/approaches-to-narrative-theory

Wednesday, 7 March 2012

A2 Examination Q1(b) - Narrative: Applying Propp's character types to your film


  • The hero - defeats the villain(s); rescues the heroine; restores equilibrium
  • The villain - causes disruption; is a threat to the heroine; fights the hero
  • The dispatcher - sends the hero on his mission
  • The donor - provides the hero with something valuable to help him/her: e.g. advice, a skill or an object
  • The helper - assists the hero, e.g. a sidekick
  • The heroine - is passive and vulnerable. (The heroine does not have to be a woman.  It can be a child, a group of people or even a man.  The "heroine" is really the victim of the villain(s) wrongdoing.)
  • The false hero - seems to be on the side of the hero but eventually deceives or betrays him.
  • The father of the heroine - this can be the family, or any loved ones, of the victim.

Your sequence, short film or trailer may have some (or even all) of these character types.  How can they be identified and what happens in your narrative that is similar to the descriptions above? (Once again, you may need to think about the whole film, even if you have only made a sequence or trailer.)


Remember that the application of this theory might be limited by the form (i.e. short film, trailer, sequence) of your product.  It is fine for you to write about the limitations of applying a theory too.

A2 Examination Q1(b) - Narrative: applying Levi-Strauss's Paradigmatic Structures to your film

Todorov deals with the order of events in a narrative.  Levi-Strauss argued that narratives are structured around conflict and oppositions e.g. hero versus villain.

A horror film might contain some of the following oppositions:

Good                Bad 
day                    night
innocence         corruption    
love                   hate
white                 black

What oppositions does your film/trailer contain and where can they be seen?  What meanings do they create?  How does the film language create these oppositions?

You may write about the oppositions that you would find if you completed the whole film but make sure that you write about actual conflicts and oppositions within your sequence or trailer that can be seen (and/or heard).

Remember that the application of this theory might be limited by the form (i.e. short film, trailer, sequence) of your product.  It is fine for you to write about the limitations of applying a theory too.

A2 Examination Q1(b) - Narrative: Applying Todorov to your film/trailer

According to Todorov, stories go through five stages:


  1. Equilibrium (or normality)
  2. Disruption to the equilibrium
  3. Recognition of the disruption
  4. An attempt is made to repair the disruption
  5. Return to equilibrium
You need to explain how your media product is structured in terms of the above.  If you were writing about a two minute opening, it may only be that equilibrium and (possibly) some disruption is seen.  However, you can explain how you would intend the rest of the film to develop and describe stages 3-5.


 A short film would go through all five stages. 


 A trailer might well show elements of stages 1-3 and probably 4 too, but 5 would almost certainly be left to the film itself.